<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Essential Discovery Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.essentialdiscovery.net/blogs/essentialdiscovery/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.essentialdiscovery.net/blogs/essentialdiscovery</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Approaches to a QC Process</title>
		<link>http://www.essentialdiscovery.net/blogs/essentialdiscovery/index.php/2011/11/approaches-to-a-qc-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.essentialdiscovery.net/blogs/essentialdiscovery/index.php/2011/11/approaches-to-a-qc-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.essentialdiscovery.net/blogs/essentialdiscovery/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of the McDermott E-Discovery malpractice lawsuit, one thing that rings clear is the need for a legally defensible quality control process for a document review. Without such a process, you are opening yourself up to a similar lawsuit in the event privilege documents are produced. It is yet to be seen why [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the McDermott E-Discovery malpractice lawsuit, one thing that rings clear is the need for a legally defensible quality control process for a document review. Without such a process, you are opening yourself up to a similar lawsuit in the event privilege documents are produced. It is yet to be seen why the privilege documents in the McDermott case were produced; however it is alleged that reviewer error and lack of quality control were major factors.</p>
<p>Below are a few common QC approaches used by attorneys involved in a document review project. These QC concepts are all designed to make sure fewer reviewer errors occur and to create a repeatable and effective quality control process.</p>
<p><strong>1. Random Sample/Reviewer Based QC</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">a. Create a one out of ten random sample of looking over reviewer documents/batches.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">b. Create mandatory protocols to review all responsive potentially privilege documents not tagged privilege in the reviewer’s batch. Include other mandatory reviews of specific tagging sequences (further review, tech issue, etc.).</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> c. Once a reviewer consistently receives a passing grade, we then sample 1 out of 25 documents, then 1 out of 50 documents. This process is coupled with a grading system to graduate reviewers to the next levels that require lower levels of sampling.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">d. Potential issue can be the lack of oversight of potentially privilege responsive documents. There is no automatic set-up of a mandatory re-review of potpriv responsive documents.</p>
<p><strong>2. Keyword search, utilization of technology, and re-review of presumptively privileged documents that were marked responsive but not marked privileged.</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">a. The general approach is to create queries based on identified hot documents and key terms, as well as running searches for presumptively privilege documents tagged both not privilege and responsive.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">i. Depending on the volume of hits, you can modify the potpriv searches to be either more or less inclusive.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">b. Utilize advance tools of platform</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">i. Run Searches for similar docs/dupes/near dupes to confirm if one of the documents has been marked privilege or confidential then all of the documents have been marked privilege/confidential</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">ii. Similar approach for redactions</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">c. The utility of this process is two fold:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">i. Identify documents reviewers may have missed during the initial first level review that are key to the case.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">ii. Add an extra layer of privilege protection.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">d. The tradeoff in utilizing this approach is that it may decrease visibility into reviewer performance. However, use of a history tool should highlight if a specific reviewer is repeating key mistakes.</p>
<p><strong>3. Mixture of keyword and random sample</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">a. Another and more thorough approach to the quality control process would be to merge the two above.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">b. This gives an overall feel of the general quality of each reviewer, while focusing in on key issues and privilege.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">c. Tradeoffs with this approach are the possible volume of quality control, and the added costs of conducting both levels of scrutiny.</p>
<p><strong>Inconsistent Tagging</strong></p>
<p>In addition to the three approaches mentioned above, the Vendor, reviewer, or project managers should run an inconsistent tagging search over the population of reviewed documents. This way you will find documents that have misclicks and can be fixed before production.<br />
<em></em></p>
<p><em><span style="color: #39c3ee;">By Aaron Fluss, Esq. Director of Project Management, Essential Discovery</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.essentialdiscovery.net/blogs/essentialdiscovery/index.php/2011/11/approaches-to-a-qc-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discover Our Resources</title>
		<link>http://www.essentialdiscovery.net/blogs/essentialdiscovery/index.php/2010/02/discovery-our-resources/</link>
		<comments>http://www.essentialdiscovery.net/blogs/essentialdiscovery/index.php/2010/02/discovery-our-resources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.essentialdiscovery.net/blogs/essentialdiscovery/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’re in the business of research and discovery. So, Essential Discovery decided it would be fitting to extend our resources to our online audiences through a blog. Our goal for this medium is to facilitate discussion and offer inside perspective on what’s happening in the eDiscovery and legal document review space.
Here, we’ll talk about current [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’re in the business of research and discovery. So, Essential Discovery decided it would be fitting to extend our resources to our online audiences through a blog. Our goal for this medium is to facilitate discussion and offer inside perspective on what’s happening in the eDiscovery and <a href="http://www.essentialdiscovery.net/Legal-Document-Review.aspx">legal document review</a> space.</p>
<p>Here, we’ll talk about current trends in eDiscovery and document review, hot topics, case studies and so forth. Just some of the blog posts we have in store for the near future include a piece on California’s adoption of the changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and a discussion on ethics in eDiscovery and document review.</p>
<p>Other topics we’ll highlight include best practices for assembling top-notch attorney teams for reviews, establishing a quality project space for hosting a review, document review and eDiscovery project management and much more.</p>
<p>We’ll draw upon many sources, including our years of hands-on experience. Our team has extensive subject-matter expertise in eDiscovery and document review and a proven record of delivering successful results to the legal industry.</p>
<p>We hope the Essential Discovery blog will be a trusted resource for professionals in the industry to learn and apply fresh ideas and proven strategy. We look forward to continuing to be an active part of the discussion among colleagues by expanding our reach to the online user.</p>
<p>Essential Discovery always welcomes your involvement. We encourage feedback and commentary in hopes this blog will be an outlet for emerging ideas that everyone can draw upon.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
The Team at Essential Discovery</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.essentialdiscovery.net/blogs/essentialdiscovery/index.php/2010/02/discovery-our-resources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

